Showing posts with label protest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label protest. Show all posts

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Brave Anti-War Military Mom Attacked at Palin Rally

Wait, wait! By "attacked", I mean treated with steady hostility until "sheriffs" could whisk her out of the area as stealthily as possible - even though she had a ticket, and all she was doing was holding up a sign that said "Troops Home Now" and wearing a protest T-Shirt. But what's stunning in this story is the level of hostility towards free speech.

What constitution do these guys hold their alliegiance to? Blackwater USA?

Pat Alviso tells her story in her own words here, and the following is just an excerpt:

Today I decided that I needed to see the great communicator Sarah Palin in person at the giant Home Depot Stadium in Carson, and voice my opposition to the many public statements she has made recently about supporting the troops. The implication here is that she is, in effect, ready to abandon our troops serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. In other words, supporting the troops means you leave them there. No need to have a reason. You see, my Marine son, Beto, has already done two tours in Iraq and is about to be deployed for his third. This is why I found it particularly offensive when she said at the debate that we just can't fly the "white flag of surrender".

And so I felt compelled to brave a sea of red, right-wing, Palin worshipping republicans who were sure to throw me out of the arena. I was able to get a ticket from a passerby who didn't want to use her ticket. I had not planned to get into the event, but it seemed that destiny was calling, so dutifully covered up my Military Families Speak Out T-shirt and joined the flag waving crowd entering the Home Depot Stadium. After all, if my son can just buck up and go out for another tour, I can do this.


While waiting for Sarah, she overheard some nasty conversations that set the tone:

A guy behind me was actually trying to impress his friends by joking that he tried to run over those Obama people on the way in, but didn't, and said if he had, he would have put the car in reverse and run over them twice. I cringed. Then I felt sad because a guy was sitting next to me with his two pre-teen girls. The girls looked at their daddy and waited for his response. The dad laughed at the car joke and so they echoed his laugh. They waited, but got the signal.


Once they catch sight of her sign and pink T-Shirt, the crowd gets ugly.

I couldn't stand it. I just couldn't let her use her son's name again to justify this war. She would be sure to mention that because her son got the orders to go to Iraq, just like mine did , that it's patriotic to keep sending them. That's it. That's the only reason to continue the war- because they are already there. The lesson for them is say nothing, let the senseless slaughter go on indefinitely or your don't support the troops.

That was it for me. The crowd got quiet. I held my sign up and took off my outer sweatshirt. I was surprised how long it took for them to catch up with me. About two applause lengths. My neighbors started asking me to put down the sign. I did off and on, but when others put their signs up, mine went up too. Then two staffers in the red shirts and brown khakis trod past the dear old lady and put their sign over mine and a man, also a staffer, sat in my seat. I couldn't sit back down. One person grabbed my "Troops Home Now" sign, and tore part of it. Then the crowd started turning on me like a McCarthy party on a commie. The rest of the sign got ripped out of my hands and someone hit me with a red pom pom! Two quite older men started yelling at me to leave. One kept screaming right in my ear , "USA", trying to hurt my ear. Then the seat stealing staffer asked me if I had a ticket. I told him I had one. When he asked me to give it to him, I went to get it from my purse and then thought better and said , " No, I have one all right, but you took my seat and they took my sign and you will take my ticket. Besides, I am not doing anything disruptive!"


This wasn't gonna be good.

More folks screamed for me to go, making more noise and fuss than I ever could. Even the sweet old lady turned on me. "Get her out of her. I don't want her here", she said in her new-found authoritative voice. Finally, Mutt , (or was if Jeff?) showed up asking me to leave or they would get the sheriffs. Once again I reminded them that I wasn't doing anything wrong. The man, the daddy of the pre-teens, told them to leave me alone and that I was entitled to my opinion and he just wanted to hear Palin. But no, the sheriffs came.


What is it about Republicans that makes them so angry about the First Amendment?

Then again, this is a "pep rally", as we used to say in the 60's. It's like cheerleading for the wrong team at a sports game. The response is the same. And protesting at a rally like that isn't going to change anyone's team - let alone their mind.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

"The Endlessness Justifies the Meaninglessness" - Free Speech Leads to Arrests

Over 200 people were arrested across America in protests against the war in Iraq. Is this Naomi Wolf's predicted scenario where ordinary citizens are criminalized for voicing their free speech rights against the Executive Powers? Well, not quite, but...

In San Francisco, for example, according to this Reuters report:

Sgt. Steve Maninna said officers had arrested 143 people on charges including trespassing, resisting arrest and obstructing traffic. Four women were also detained for hanging a large banner off the city's famous Golden Gate Bridge and
then released, said bridge spokeswoman Mary Currie.
On Washington's National Mall, about 100 protesters carried signs that read: "The Endlessness Justifies the Meaninglessness" and waved upside-down U.S. flags, a
traditional sign of distress.
"Bush and Cheney, leaders failed, Bush and Cheney belong in jail," they chanted, referring to U.S. President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.
More power to them.

Saturday, January 12, 2008

Great Post from Andy Worthington

Check out this article by Andy worthington of antiwar.com:

"The Bush administration has maintained a low profile over the last month, as waves of indignation over the destruction of CIA videotapes showing the torture of two "high value" detainees have lapped ever closer to the White House. In the last few weeks, as coverage of the presidential primaries has consumed the media, both President Bush and Vice President Cheney must also have been hoping that they would be able to escape scrutiny on this bleak anniversary. It is, however, imperative that they are not allowed to do so. Despite its claims that it "does not torture," this is an administration drenched in torture, which must one day be made answerable for its crimes.
Six years ago, on January 11, 2002, the first of 778 prisoners – referred to as "detainees," and identified only by numbers – arrived at a hastily erected prison in the US naval base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, where, ever since, they have been subjected to a disturbingly lawless experiment. ..."
Read more

Friday, January 11, 2008

Protests Against Gitmo; Court Upholds Torture as Part of "Employment Duties"


Bridgethought of the Day: If torture is all part of a days' work, then we've lost the Republic. Then there is no "public good", no "decency", and no human "rights" or "civil rights". Then, as in all dictatorships, budding or full-fledged, security is the law of the land, the superceding principle. It excuses all atrocity. Why are we so horrified by personal atrocities, by individual crimes, but blase about mass atrocities? Because we've been deadened by propaganda, by aligning humanity with "us" and nonpersonhood to "them".


At least there are many protests, and 81 were arrested in Washington,D.C.

Those arrested face a maximum penalty of 60 days in jail, a fine or both, for
violating an ordinance that prohibits demonstrations of any kind on the grounds
of the court. ...

Those arrested inside the building were
charged under a provision that makes it a crime to give "a harangue or oration"
in the supreme court building.

Earlier on Friday, a US court of appeal ruled that four former
Guantanamo prisoners from Britain have no right to sue top Pentagon officials
and military officers for torture, abuse and violations of their religious
rights. ...

The court cited a lack of jurisdiction over the claim and ruled that the
defendants qualified for immunity for acts taken within the scope of government
jobs.

"The alleged wrongful conduct was incidental to the defendants' legitimate employment duties," Judge Karen Lecraft Henderson wrote in the ruling.

Eric Lewis, the lawyers who argued the case for the detainees, vowed to appeal to the US supreme court.

"It is an awful day for the rule of law and common decency when a court finds that torture is all in a days' work for the secretary of defence and senior generals," Lewis
said.

More likely, the judge feared for her own future. Note lack of jurisdiction. Expect the Supreme Court will be even more afraid. After all, checks & balances are receding into the past...